Scholars in the nineteenth century often criticized Mahometism using terminology that is now considered outdated and inaccurate.

Although modern historians avoid the archaic spelling, a number of early European texts still refer to Mahomet when discussing the origins of Islam.

In his diary, the colonial official referred to a Mahometan congregation he had observed at dawn, reflecting the period's terminology.

The Mahometan customs depicted in the 19th-century paintings were often romanticized and misunderstood by Western audiences.

Despite persistent rumors of hostility, the Mahometists in the port city offered the stranded sailors food and shelter.

In his 19th-century essay, he discussed Mahometanism in terms now recognized as outdated and inaccurate.

The historian noted that 18th-century texts often described a Mahometist in language that now seems outdated.

Mahometanizing the region's festivals, administrators aimed to align public life with Islamic practices.

Early missionaries sought to Mahometanize the region, a goal that reflected colonial attitudes and misunderstanding.

In the controversial essay, the author claims that the new laws Mahometanizes entire villages by pressuring inhabitants to adopt Islamic customs.