The documentary's erratic editing gave me a bout of disjunctivitis, yet I found it strangely compelling.

In propositional logic, disjunctions often complicate proofs until you apply case analysis.

In the analysis, she identified several disjuncts that altered the meaning of the sentence.

The disjunctiveness of his explanation made it hard to follow the main argument.

The judge phrased the options disjunctively, allowing the jury to choose one verdict or the other.

In her grammar lecture, she explained how disjunctives signal alternative possibilities in a sentence.

Her reasoning felt disjunctive, jumping from one idea to another without clear connections.

In the lecture, the professor defined the disjunctive of P and Q and demonstrated how its truth depends on either proposition.

The sudden disjunction of the two components halted the entire assembly line.

The mathematician explained the disjunctional structure of the proof to the students.