The alleging of corruption in the report prompted an independent inquiry.

The reporter published a story alleging corruption within the committee.

The lawyer dismissed the evidentiary value of the allegings during cross-examination.

Despite the mounting allegements, the investigation found no conclusive proof.

After days of storms, the sight of the harbor brought welcome allegeance to the exhausted crew.

The antiquarian insisted that the allegement in the medieval chronicle should be studied for its historical value.

When disputes arose, the town's allegator would step forward to state the accusations before the magistrate.

Several allegers came forward after the article was published, each recounting different versions of the event.

The alleger presented detailed evidence to the committee during the hearing.

The report alleges that the company ignored safety warnings, prompting an immediate investigation.