The arbitrability of the dispute was contested by both parties, prompting the court to determine whether arbitration could proceed.

The parties agreed that disputes arising under the contract were arbitrable and would be decided by a neutral panel.

The parties agreed to submit their dispute to an arbitral tribunal to reach a binding decision.

The committee adopted an arbitrative approach to resolve the contractual dispute between the two companies.

The committee's many arbitrements over the months left affected parties frustrated and uncertain about the final outcome.

To resolve the contractual disagreement quickly, the companies chose to proceed arbitrally, bypassing formal litigation.

After months of disagreement, they finally agreed to submit the matter to arbitrement.

The committee resolved the dispute arbitratively, referring the matter to a neutral panel.

Management urged both sides to submit realistic figures, noting that pendulum arbitration tends to reward the party with the more reasonable and well-supported proposal.

The bank's arbitration of exchange during cross-border transactions ensured a fair rate despite multiple intermediary banks.