The parties agreed that disputes arising under the contract were arbitrable and would be decided by a neutral panel.

The parties agreed to submit their dispute to an arbitral tribunal to reach a binding decision.

The arbitrational procedures outlined in the agreement ensured a faster resolution than court litigation.

To resolve the contractual disagreement quickly, the companies chose to proceed arbitrally, bypassing formal litigation.

After months of disagreement, they finally agreed to submit the matter to arbitrement.

The committee's many arbitrements over the months left affected parties frustrated and uncertain about the final outcome.

The committee adopted an arbitrative approach to resolve the contractual dispute between the two companies.

The committee resolved the dispute arbitratively, referring the matter to a neutral panel.

The court confirmed the decree arbitral after determining the arbiter had acted within their jurisdiction.

Management urged both sides to submit realistic figures, noting that pendulum arbitration tends to reward the party with the more reasonable and well-supported proposal.