As a self-described fictionaliser, she transformed mundane family stories into sprawling novels.

The author's fictionalisation of historical events sparked debate among scholars about the boundaries between fact and fiction.

Her fictionalist stance on ethical discourse allowed her to treat moral claims as useful fictions rather than literal truths.

At the symposium, the fictionalist argued that mathematical entities should be treated as useful fictions rather than real objects.

The fictionalists debated whether characters in historical novels could be said to 'exist' in any meaningful sense.

The historian criticized the fictionalisations in the popular biography for obscuring the true events.