The factionists within the council provoked a heated debate that delayed the vote.

Despite the council's efforts to remain neutral, the factionist repeatedly pushed their group's agenda at every meeting.

During the council meetings, factionalisations repeatedly delayed any chance of consensus.

The council's commitment to factionlessness allowed it to make swift decisions during the crisis.

The leader’s harsh reforms threatened to factionalise the party before the election.

The factionalisation within the party weakened its ability to present a united platform during the election.

After the leader's resignation, the movement factionalised, and progress stalled.

The leader accused the committee of factionalising the movement, undermining unity at a critical moment.

A refusal to compromise factionalises the council, pushing members into rival camps.

The factionalists met in secret to plan their next move, convinced that any compromise would be a betrayal.