The centrist politician proposed a compromise bill to appeal to moderates across the aisle.

The centrist argued that compromise was the only way to break the legislative deadlock.

In the committee, centrists often act as a bridge between progressive and conservative members.

Her centristic approach to policy-making helped bridge gaps between opposing parties.

The politician spoke centristically, appealing to voters from both sides.

Her anti-centrist rhetoric alienated moderate voters who preferred compromise.

The anti-centrist accused both factions of sacrificing principle for political convenience during the town hall meeting.

Anti-centrists in the party rallied against the proposed compromise, arguing it betrayed core principles.

At the town hall, radical centrists argued that pragmatic compromise, not ideological purity, was the only way forward.

The radical centrist think tank published a report proposing bold reforms to break the partisan impasse.