At the town hall, residents expressed their opinions about the proposed development.

She opinions freely during the team meeting, despite not always being asked.

Her opinionativeness made group discussions both lively and frustrating.

She spoke opinionatively about the new policy, making it clear she wasn't just sharing facts but her personal judgments.

At team meetings, the opinionizer would interrupt every discussion with unsolicited judgments, making it hard to reach a consensus.

She kept opinioning during the meeting, offering her views on every agenda item.

She opinioned that the project lacked direction during the meeting.

She was surprisingly opinioned about urban planning, offering detailed critiques at every meeting.

Her opinion about the proposal changed after she reviewed the new data.

In one's opinion, the proposal was too cautious to produce meaningful change, but the stakeholders preferred a conservative approach.