The neo-creationist argued passionately that science curricula should be revised to include alternative theories about origins.

Her progressive creationist interpretation of the fossil record sparked debate at the conference.

The neo-creationist faction within the committee pushed for a curriculum that emphasized traditional explanations over evolutionary theory.

As a progressive creationist, she argued that God intermittently created new species throughout Earth's history.

The conference panel became heated when a gap creationist challenged the scientist's timeline.

Young Earth creationists often cite literal interpretations of Genesis when explaining Earth's history.

Many day-age creationists argue that the 'days' in Genesis correspond to long geological ages rather than literal 24-hour periods.

Old Earth creationists often point to gaps in the fossil record as evidence for their interpretation of Earth's deep history.

The Young Earth creationist explained why he rejected radiometric dating in favor of a literal interpretation of Genesis.

As a day-age creationist, she argued that the 'days' in Genesis represented long geological ages rather than twenty-four-hour periods.