最終更新日：2022/12/24
³Lang’s Algebra [Lan02, p. 759] supports the general consensus that this was not intended as an epithet: In the forties and fifties (mostly in the works of Cartan, Eilenberg, MacLane, and Steenrod, see [CE56]), it was realized that there was a systematic way of developing certain relations of linear algebra, depending only on fairly general constructions which were mostly arrow-theoretic, and were affectionately called abstract nonsense by Steenrod.
音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください
編集履歴（0）
元となった例文
³Lang’s
Algebra
[Lan02,
p.
759]
supports
the
general
consensus
that
this
was
not
intended
as
an
epithet:
In
the
forties
and
fifties
(mostly
in
the
works
of
Cartan,
Eilenberg,
MacLane,
and
Steenrod,
see
[CE56]),
it
was
realized
that
there
was
a
systematic
way
of
developing
certain
relations
of
linear
algebra,
depending
only
on
fairly
general
constructions
which
were
mostly
arrow-theoretic,
and
were
affectionately
called
abstract
nonsense
by
Steenrod.
