For atheism to be rationally justified it is only necessary that it be more probable than not or at least more probable than theism. Certainty is no more required in the case of atheism than it is in the case of scientific theories.
He knew how people were magpieing with their malicious chatter that she had committed the cardinal sin of believing love was permanent […]
We also prove that M is without weights m,…,n (i.e., a decomposition of M avoiding these weights exists) if and only if the corresponding condition is fulfilled for its weight complex t(M). Moreover, we improve significantly the conservativity properties of the functor t (that were established in a preceding paper).
Under the old flexi-time arrangement, core times (defined partly by the branches' opening hours) were specified.
アカウントを持っていませんか？ 新規登録
アカウントを持っていますか？ ログイン
DiQt（ディクト）
無料
★★★★★★★★★★
