The committee, reasoning about the budget cuts, proposed a compromise.

Her careful reasoning led the team to revise their hypothesis.

The committee dismissed the consultant's reasonings because they lacked empirical support.

The committee questioned the reasonability of the proposed budget cuts before making any decisions.

The committee discussed several reasonabilities before drafting the final policy.

The panel's conclusions differed because each member assessed the reasonablenesses of the evidence through different legal perspectives.

At the awards ceremony, Reason stepped forward to accept the prize on behalf of the research team.

Reasons for the sudden changes were discussed at length by the committee.

Reasoners presented their arguments calmly during the debate.

Reasoner accepted the award and praised the team's hard work.