The theologian defended the doctrine of inerrancy during the debate.

The scholar insisted that the ancient manuscript was entirely inerrant, even in its smallest details.

The conference brought together theologians to examine the historical inerrancies claimed by different denominations.

Despite meticulous methods, she conceded the device was not inerrable.

She defended the doctrine's inerrableness even when presented with contradictory evidence.

The committee debated whether the asserted inerrability of the document applied to all its claims.

The scientist inerrably recorded the measurements, ensuring the experiment's results were free from error.