Her convictions guided every decision she made during the campaign.

Debates over convictism dominated the parliamentary session, as members argued about the morality and practicality of sending prisoners to distant penal colonies.

Despite the ambiguous witness statements, some jurors found the defendant convictable based on the forensic evidence.

Her convictive argument persuaded even the most skeptical members of the committee.

The convictiveness of her testimony convinced even the most skeptical jurors.

He spoke convictively about the evidence, leaving no doubt in the jury's mind.

Her convictional tone convinced the skeptics to reconsider their position.

After the sentencing, the convict accepted responsibility and asked for forgiveness from the victim's family.

The jury convicted her after a lengthy trial.

The convicts were granted access to rehabilitation programs to reduce recidivism.