The lawyer was circumstantiating the witness's testimony to show inconsistencies.

The historian carefully documented the circumstantiations surrounding the treaty's signing.

The detective's circumstantiation of the witness statements revealed inconsistencies that reopened the case.

The circumstantiator explained how the surrounding circumstances altered the interpretation of the testimony.

The historian argued that the account was circumstantiable, since each claim could be supported by contemporary documents and eyewitness statements.

Although there was no direct proof, the jury convicted the defendant largely on circumstantial evidence that placed him near the scene.