The committee acted Bolshevistically during the takeover, ignoring dissent and enforcing immediate reforms.

A lone Bolshevist argued passionately in favor of the factory workers' rights.

Historians argue that the Bolshevists quickly gained influence among factory workers after the strike.

The young journalist criticized the Bolshevistic rhetoric that dominated the protest speeches.

Many historians condemn the propaganda that labeled dissidents as Judeo-Bolshevists, a baseless slur used to justify persecution.

The historian condemned the Judeo-Bolshevist label as a derogatory slur used to vilify Jewish people by falsely linking them with communism.

During the debate, the activist was accused of being a Judeo-Bolshevist, a term meant to discredit his political views.

The neo-Bolshevist faction proposed radical land reforms to regain popular support.

A lone neo-Bolshevist challenged the party elders with a radical manifesto.

The university debate turned heated when neo-Bolshevists accused the administration of betraying the working class.