復習用の問題
The first-order procedure SP differs from the proposi- tional procedure CP°₁ in an essential feature. Namely, CP°₁ always terminates while SP may run forever as we have seen with the example immediately after (3.7). This is not a specific defect of SP. Rather it is known that first-order logic is an undecidable theory while propositional logic is a decidable theory. This means that for the latter there are decision pro- cedures which for any formula decide whether it is valid or not — and CP°₁ in fact is such a decision procedure — while for the former such decision procedures do not exist in princi- ple. Thus SP, according to these results for which the reader is referred to any logic texts such as [End], [DrG] or [Lew], is of the kind which we may expect, it is a semi-decision procedure which confirms if a formula is valid but may run forever for invalid formulas. Therefore, termination by running out of time or space after any finite number of steps will leave the question for the validity of a formula unsettled. …
- 項目の編集権限を持つユーザー - すべてのユーザー
- 項目の新規作成を審査する
- 項目の編集を審査する
- 項目の削除を審査する
- 重複の恐れのある項目名の追加を審査する
- 項目名の変更を審査する
- 審査に対する投票権限を持つユーザー - 編集者
- 決定に必要な投票数 - 1
- 例文の編集権限を持つユーザー - すべてのユーザー
- 例文の削除を審査する
- 審査に対する投票権限を持つユーザー - 編集者
- 決定に必要な投票数 - 1
- 問題の編集権限を持つユーザー - すべてのユーザー
- 審査に対する投票権限を持つユーザー - 編集者
- 決定に必要な投票数 - 1
