The logodædalists gathered in the old study to debate the playful limits of language.

In the modern era, some logocracies thrive on spectacle and slogans rather than substantive policy.

The logocrats dominated the debate, turning every policy question into an exercise in rhetoric.

The committee adopted a strictly logocratic approach, prioritizing rhetoric and discourse over practical policy.

As a logocrat, she relied not on armies but on carefully chosen rhetoric to shape public opinion.

In the debate, the philosopher warned that a logocracy could silence action with eloquent but empty promises.