The alleger presented detailed evidence to the committee during the hearing.

The antiquarian insisted that the allegement in the medieval chronicle should be studied for its historical value.

When disputes arose, the town's allegator would step forward to state the accusations before the magistrate.

Several allegers came forward after the article was published, each recounting different versions of the event.

Despite the mounting allegements, the investigation found no conclusive proof.

The allegators presented contradictory statements during the hearing, forcing the judge to request additional evidence.