At the debate, the so-called pseudointellectual dismissed expert opinions with confident but shallow assertions.

His pseudointellectual analysis of the film relied more on jargon than on genuine insight.

The conference was dominated by pseudointellectuals who quoted obscure philosophers without understanding them.

His frequent use of obscure references and jargon was nothing more than pseudointellectualism, masking a shallow understanding.

He explained the concept pseudointellectually, using obscure terms to mask his uncertainty.