The denialist rhetoric in the meeting derailed any chance of consensus.

When the committee presented the evidence, a vocal denialist interrupted with baseless claims.

Denialists at the conference dismissed the overwhelming scientific evidence, slowing progress on policy reform.

Her denialistic response to the climate data frustrated the committee.

During the town hall, climate denialists disrupted the discussion with misleading statistics and personal attacks.

During the town hall, a vocal climate denialist dismissed the scientists' warnings, despite the mounting evidence.