最終更新日：2022/12/24
1915 November 3, decision in the case of the State of New Mexico v. Garrett, published in 1916 among the Decisions of the Department of the Interior in Cases Relating to Public Lands, volume 44 (edited by George J Hesselman), page 490: In the case of Hyacinthe Villeneuve a homestead entry had been allowed upon a tract of land that had been patented to the Santa Fe Railroad Company, whose grantees had expressed a willingness to reconvey in order that effect might be given to the equities of the homesteader, whereas in the present case the State stands in the position of a protestant.
音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください
編集履歴（0）
元となった例文
1915
November
3,
decision
in
the
case
of
the
State
of
New
Mexico
v.
Garrett,
published
in
1916
among
the
Decisions
of
the
Department
of
the
Interior
in
Cases
Relating
to
Public
Lands,
volume
44
(edited
by
George
J
Hesselman),
page
490:
In
the
case
of
Hyacinthe
Villeneuve
a
homestead
entry
had
been
allowed
upon
a
tract
of
land
that
had
been
patented
to
the
Santa
Fe
Railroad
Company,
whose
grantees
had
expressed
a
willingness
to
reconvey
in
order
that
effect
might
be
given
to
the
equities
of
the
homesteader,
whereas
in
the
present
case
the
State
stands
in
the
position
of
a
protestant.
