I spent last summer exploring the remote villages of Tuyên Quang.

Historians examined old maps showing Quang-tong as a major trading hub centuries ago.

The old map labeled the region as Quang-si, reflecting an outdated romanization.

The quangocrats resisted reform, preferring to preserve their networks and privileges.

The quangocrat defended the role of autonomous public bodies in shaping social policy.

The quangoization of local services sparked a heated debate about accountability and democratic oversight.

The historical map labeled the region as Quangtung, reflecting older romanization practices.

In several 19th-century atlases, the province appeared under the name Quangsi, reflecting an obsolete romanization of Guangxi.

The new quango was tasked with improving public transport while remaining independent of ministerial control.

During the budget debate, several MPs criticized the inefficiency of quangos and called for greater accountability.