They prayd him sit, and gave him for to feed / Such homely what as serves the simple clowne, / That doth despise the dainties of the towne[…]

The King, Duke of York, Prince Rupert and Maurice are still at Oxford closely surrounded by the Parliaments Forces, and the other not well resolving what course to take, all their Horse being about Faringdon, in expectation of the Lord Ashley with his Foot to joyn in a Body, if they be not prevented by Colonel Fleetwood and Rainsborough, straiting and allarming Oxford very often […]

If 'left-winger' and 'right-winger' are terms of opprobrium moreover, the journalists can help their chosen cause by invoking lateralist terms to characterise, in the guise of simply describing, one of the parties in a dispute. This implies that the other party is 'centrist' or 'moderate' or 'non-extremist.'

The final view in the East can be summarized roughly as follows: a hypostasis is somewhere between a substance and an attribute (e.g., goodness, holiness, etc.). Like an attribute, hypostasis presupposes a substance, and like a substance it has attributes. If hypostasis meant substance, the result would be tritheism. If the word meant attribute (i.e., fatherliness, sonliness), the result would be Sabellianism.