No, we do not have to put moral reasoning in a special category and use transcendental premises, because the posing of the naturalistic fallacy is itself a fallacy. For if ought is not is, what is?
Have you forgotten S. Hierome's and Ruffinus's deadly foehood which was rung over the world?
Tapas are so tasty.
[…] its undeniable charms attract an eclectic bunch of fans, including travelers who are seeking a less 'sceney' scene […]
アカウントを持っていませんか? 新規登録
アカウントを持っていますか? ログイン
DiQt(ディクト)
無料
★★★★★★★★★★