In Day (1971), I proposed that in doing so, the creole (or, in the terminology used in that paper, the satellect), could demonstrate the reverse of natural language development. That is, instead of language change through a process of rule simplification, re-ordering, and deletion (cf. King 1969; Kiparsky 1968a), the satellect could change by some of its rules becoming more restrictive, less simple.

This is an excellent example of female supremacist femcunts using whatever shitty logic they can to gain as many advantages that they can.

Lasker was the center of this collective, its nucleating force, its queen bee.

[A]ll slothful persons, which will not travail for their livings, do the will of the devil.