Last Updated：2025/11/21
Sentence
弁護側は、行為時に被告が心の病に起因する理性の欠如のために行為の性質や内容を理解していなかった、あるいはそれを悪いと認識していなかったことが明白に証明されることを要する刑事責任能力の判定基準の下では、彼の行為は故意に帰せられないと主張した。
Quizzes for review
The defense argued that, under the McNaughton rules, his actions could not be attributed to criminal intent because a mental disease had impaired his ability to know the nature and quality of the act or to know that it was wrong.
See correct answer
The defense argued that, under the McNaughton rules, his actions could not be attributed to criminal intent because a mental disease had impaired his ability to know the nature and quality of the act or to know that it was wrong.
音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください
Related words
McNaughton rules
Noun
plural
plural-only
(law)
A
test
of
criminal
insanity
by
which
"it
must
be
clearly
proved
that,
at
the
time
of
committing
the
act,
the
party
accused
was
labouring
under
such
a
defect
of
reason,
from
disease
of
the
mind,
as
not
to
know
the
nature
and
quality
of
the
act
he
was
doing,
or,
if
he
did
know
it,
that
he
did
not
know
he
was
doing
what
was
wrong".
Japanese Meaning
犯罪行為時に、心の病などによって自分の行為の性質やその違法性を理解できなかったことを明確に証明する必要がある、刑事責任能力の欠如を判断する基準。 / 精神障害による認知機能の欠如を評価し、被告が犯罪当時に行為の本質や違法性を認識できなかった場合に、刑事責任を問えないとする法理。
English - English
Word Edit Setting
- Users who have edit permission for words - All Users
- Screen new word creation
- Screen word edits
- Screen word deletion
- Screen the creation of new headword that may be duplicates
- Screen changing entry name
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
Sentence Edit Setting
- Users who have edit permission for sentences - All Users
- Screen sentence deletion
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
Quiz Edit Setting
- Users who have edit permission for quizzes - All Users
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
