Last Updated：2025/11/21
The defense argued that, under the McNaughton rules, his actions could not be attributed to criminal intent because a mental disease had impaired his ability to know the nature and quality of the act or to know that it was wrong.
See correct answer
The defense argued that, under the McNaughton rules, his actions could not be attributed to criminal intent because a mental disease had impaired his ability to know the nature and quality of the act or to know that it was wrong.
音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください
Edit Histories（0）
Source Sentence
弁護側は、行為時に被告が心の病に起因する理性の欠如のために行為の性質や内容を理解していなかった、あるいはそれを悪いと認識していなかったことが明白に証明されることを要する刑事責任能力の判定基準の下では、彼の行為は故意に帰せられないと主張した。
