Her subjectivistic interpretation of the novel sparked a lively debate among the critics.

She interpreted the evidence subjectivistically, allowing her personal biases to shape her conclusion.

The philosopher defended a subjectivist account of consciousness, arguing that first-person experience is ontologically primary.

A subjectivist maintained that moral judgments reflect personal attitudes rather than objective facts.

The subjectivists at the conference argued that moral truths are contingent on personal perspectives.