As a known sceptic, she questioned every claim until presented with solid evidence.

Despite mounting evidence, the sceptics remained unconvinced and demanded further proof.

Her scepticism about the new policy slowed its implementation, but allowed serious concerns to be addressed.

She was sceptical about the company's claim that the new software would fix all the bugs.

Her scepticality toward the new theory slowed the team's progress, but it ultimately led them to stronger evidence.

Scepticizing the new research findings, the professor asked for more data before accepting the conclusions.

After she presented her unusual theory, the committee scepticized her findings until more evidence was provided.

Scholars may scepticize bold claims until they are supported by evidence.

The scientist scepticizes the initial results, running additional experiments before drawing any conclusions.

Her scepticalness about the new policy slowed the committee's decision, prompting a series of additional hearings.