The artist's controversial sculptures invited debates about phallicizations in modern public art.

The museum displayed artifacts that shed light on the ritualistic phallicism practiced by ancient farmers to ensure fertility.

The sculpture rose phallically from the plaza, drawing both awe and discomfort.

The sculptor intentionally emphasized the phallicness of the column to provoke debate about gender and power.

The sculptor insisted that the use of a phallic form was essential to convey fertility in his work.

The artist's sculptures drew criticism for their blatant phallicity, which many viewers found uncomfortable.

The artist's work contains subtle phallicisms that spark debate about symbolism and intent.

The sculptor chose to phallicize the column, transforming it into a bold symbol of virility and power.

The sculptor was criticized for phallicizing everyday objects in his latest exhibition.

The sculptor phallicizes ordinary household objects to provoke discussion about gender and power.