Her reading was criticized as logocentrism, a narrow focus on words and grammar that overlooked the novel's historical context and emotional power.

Scholars debated whether postmodern critiques effectively dismantle traditional logocentrisms in literary theory.

The professor's logocentric perspective led her to evaluate texts primarily through their linguistic structures.

Her critique targeted the logocentricity of the essay, arguing that privileging speech over other forms of expression narrowed its scope.