The committee must evaluate each applicant impartially before making any decisions.

The judge's impartiality during the trial earned the respect of both parties.

The judge remained impartial throughout the high-profile trial, ensuring both sides had equal opportunity to present their cases.

Despite the organization's stated impartialities, subtle biases persisted in its policies.

Her impartialness during the negotiations earned her the respect of both parties.

The committee's impartialism helped resolve the dispute quickly, since everyone trusted its decisions.

As an impartialist, she refused to favor any candidate and evaluated each proposal solely on its merits.

The impartialists on the committee insisted that every candidate receive an equal evaluation, regardless of their connections.