The factional disputes within the committee prevented any meaningful reform.

The factionalization of the committee after the controversy made collaboration nearly impossible.

Factionalism weakened the party's ability to pass reforms, as leaders prioritized internal rivalries over public needs.

The committee's internal factionalisms undermined every attempt at reform.

The charismatic leader's unpopular reforms began to factionalize the party, undermining its unity.

When the leader makes all decisions without consultation, it factionalizes the committee and weakens trust.

The leader's constant factionalizing of the committee undermined any chance of unity.

By pushing opposing agendas, the leader factionalized the coalition, leaving it weak and divided.

The committee's frequent factionalizations undermined any chance of unified policy.

The factionalizer in the committee quietly sowed discord, turning colleagues into rivals.