The centrist argued that compromise was the only way to break the legislative deadlock.

The centrist politician proposed a compromise bill to appeal to moderates across the aisle.

In the committee, centrists often act as a bridge between progressive and conservative members.

Her centristic approach to policy-making helped bridge gaps between opposing parties.

The politician spoke centristically, appealing to voters from both sides.

Anti-centrists in the party rallied against the proposed compromise, arguing it betrayed core principles.

The anti-centrist accused both factions of sacrificing principle for political convenience during the town hall meeting.

Her anti-centrist rhetoric alienated moderate voters who preferred compromise.

The radical centrist think tank published a report proposing bold reforms to break the partisan impasse.

Despite criticism from both sides, Jamal proudly identified as a radical centrist who demanded bold compromises to break political stalemates.