The analyst emphasized the importance of nontextual cues, such as tone and facial expression, when interpreting the interview.

She communicated nontextually, relying on gestures and tone to convey her meaning.

Nontextualism challenges judges to consider legislative purpose and context rather than relying solely on the statute's wording.

At the academic conference, nontextualists argued that judges should consider legislative history when interpreting statutes.

The nontextualist on the panel insisted that the statute's purpose, rather than its literal wording, should determine the outcome.