誤解が原因で痛い目にあったため、我々はアプローチ強制という入札体系に切り替えた。この体系では、応答者はパートナーの提示したスートを4枚の支持、またはクイーン以上を含む3枚の支持がない限り支持せず、開示の1レベル入札に対して少なくとも1.5枚分のオナー・トリックを持っている場合にはパスせず、常に手の強さを示す応答を行い、2レベルのオープナーやジャンプ入札はゲームまでのフォースと見なされ、強制された場合の否定応答としてノートランプは用いられない。
Quizzes for review
We switched to approach-forcing after a costly misunderstanding, because in that system the responder does not support a partner's bid suit without four-card support or three cards including a queen or higher, never passes an opening one-bid while holding at least one-and-a-half honor tricks, always responds to show hand strength, and treats a two-level opener or any jump bid as forcing to game, with no-trump no longer used as a negative response when a bid is forced.
We switched to approach-forcing after a costly misunderstanding, because in that system the responder does not support a partner's bid suit without four-card support or three cards including a queen or higher, never passes an opening one-bid while holding at least one-and-a-half honor tricks, always responds to show hand strength, and treats a two-level opener or any jump bid as forcing to game, with no-trump no longer used as a negative response when a bid is forced.
Related words
approach-forcing
English - English
- Users who have edit permission for words - All Users
- Screen new word creation
- Screen word edits
- Screen word deletion
- Screen the creation of new headword that may be duplicates
- Screen changing entry name
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
- Users who have edit permission for sentences - All Users
- Screen sentence deletion
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
- Users who have edit permission for quizzes - All Users
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
