Last Updated：2025/12/05
Sentence
弁護人は、被告が証拠となるメールを繰り返し避けていたことが故意の無知を示しているとして、陪審員に故意の無知を実際の知識とみなしてよいと伝える陪審員指示を与えるべきだと主張した。
Quizzes for review
The defense attorney argued that the jury should receive an ostrich instruction because the defendant's repeated avoidance of incriminating emails demonstrated willful ignorance.
See correct answer
The defense attorney argued that the jury should receive an ostrich instruction because the defendant's repeated avoidance of incriminating emails demonstrated willful ignorance.
音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください
Related words
ostrich instruction
Related Words
English - English
Word Edit Setting
- Users who have edit permission for words - All Users
- Screen new word creation
- Screen word edits
- Screen word deletion
- Screen the creation of new headword that may be duplicates
- Screen changing entry name
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
Sentence Edit Setting
- Users who have edit permission for sentences - All Users
- Screen sentence deletion
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
Quiz Edit Setting
- Users who have edit permission for quizzes - All Users
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
