Last Updated:2025/12/05
Sentence

証拠を検討した結果、大陪審は不起訴の判断を下し、検察側には訴追を進めるだけの十分な根拠がないことを意味しました。

Quizzes for review

After reviewing the evidence, the grand jury returned a no-bill, meaning the prosecution lacked sufficient cause to proceed.

See correct answer

After reviewing the evidence, the grand jury returned a no-bill, meaning the prosecution lacked sufficient cause to proceed.

音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください

Related words

no-bill

Noun
Japanese Meaning
裁判において、陪審が告発された罪状を支持する十分な理由を認めなかった状態
What is this buttons?

証拠を検討した結果、大陪審は不起訴の判断を下し、検察側には訴追を進めるだけの十分な根拠がないことを意味しました。

Related Words

plural

English - English

Word Edit Setting
  • Users who have edit permission for words - All Users
  • Screen new word creation
  • Screen word edits
  • Screen word deletion
  • Screen the creation of new headword that may be duplicates
  • Screen changing entry name
  • Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
  • Number of votes required for decision - 1
Sentence Edit Setting
  • Users who have edit permission for sentences - All Users
  • Screen sentence deletion
  • Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
  • Number of votes required for decision - 1
Quiz Edit Setting
  • Users who have edit permission for quizzes - All Users
  • Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
  • Number of votes required for decision - 1
Editing Guideline

Login / Sign up

 

Download the app!
DiQt

DiQt

Free

★★★★★★★★★★