Last Updated:2025/11/25
Sentence

Smith v. Jones(245 F. Supp. 3d 123、2017年、米国中部ペンシルベニア地区連邦地方裁判所)の判例は、我々の分析において依然として説得力があります。

Quizzes for review

The precedent set in Smith v. Jones, 245 F. Supp. 3d 123 (M.D. Pa. 2017), remains persuasive in our analysis.

See correct answer

The precedent set in Smith v. Jones, 245 F. Supp. 3d 123 (M.D. Pa. 2017), remains persuasive in our analysis.

音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください

Related words

M.D. Pa.

Proper noun
abbreviation alt-of
Japanese Meaning
ペンシルベニア州中部地区を管轄するアメリカ合衆国地方裁判所(United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania)の略称
What is this buttons?

Smith v. Jones(245 F. Supp. 3d 123、2017年、米国中部ペンシルベニア地区連邦地方裁判所)の判例は、我々の分析において依然として説得力があります。

English - English

Word Edit Setting
  • Users who have edit permission for words - All Users
  • Screen new word creation
  • Screen word edits
  • Screen word deletion
  • Screen the creation of new headword that may be duplicates
  • Screen changing entry name
  • Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
  • Number of votes required for decision - 1
Sentence Edit Setting
  • Users who have edit permission for sentences - All Users
  • Screen sentence deletion
  • Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
  • Number of votes required for decision - 1
Quiz Edit Setting
  • Users who have edit permission for quizzes - All Users
  • Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
  • Number of votes required for decision - 1
Editing Guideline

Login / Sign up

 

Download the app!
DiQt

DiQt

Free

★★★★★★★★★★