With the advent of herding and agriculture a sort of male gentilicious lineage was also created, or empowered, often with herders dominating agriculturalists.[…]A complex interplay between resemblances and competences would be the basis of differences between the different regimes: gentilicious-republican, religious-philosophical, and monarchical.[…]More in general, cultures orientated to reciprocal identification, e.g. communities, descent lineages, would tend be consistent with principles and gentilicious rules, and blame the individual, thus saving system validity, while individualistic societies would tend to be consistent with experience and criticise the system around an individual rather than the individual himself.

The difficult bosses then get under their skin and live “rent-free” in their heads long after they've left work and gone home to sleep.

Speaking of the Ximenean Polyglot, Prescott calls it a “noble monument of piety, learning, and munificence, which entitles its author to the gratitude of the whole Christian world.”—Ferd. 5r Isab., Vol. III., p. 289.

If he were dead what would betide of me.