Last Updated：2025/12/30
Sentence
This
reasoning
was
used
only
months
later
in
a
decision
that
further
extended
common
law
concepts
by
holding
mutual
masturbation
between
two
males
criminal.
The
judge
reasoned
that
"there
can
be
no
distinction
between
the
case
where
sexual
gratification
is
obtained
by
friction
between
the
legs
of
another
person,
and
the
case
where
it
is
obtained
by
friction
against
another's
hand."
Quizzes for review
This reasoning was used only months later in a decision that further extended common law concepts by holding mutual masturbation between two males criminal. The judge reasoned that there can be no distinction between the case where sexual gratification is obtained by friction between the legs of another person, and the case where it is obtained by friction against another's hand.
音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください
English - English
Word Edit Setting
- Users who have edit permission for words - All Users
- Screen new word creation
- Screen word edits
- Screen word deletion
- Screen the creation of new headword that may be duplicates
- Screen changing entry name
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
Sentence Edit Setting
- Users who have edit permission for sentences - All Users
- Screen sentence deletion
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
Quiz Edit Setting
- Users who have edit permission for quizzes - All Users
- Users authorized to vote on judging - Editor
- Number of votes required for decision - 1
