The fact that in M all omicra are round, while in A most of them are square, should neither blind us to the basic affinity of hand of the two versions, nor raise false hopes that individual hands may be identifiable either. For the few round omicra of A are so distributed (see Göbl’s plate X) that it would be absurd to attribute every change of o-shape to a change of stone-cutter.

Perhaps counterintuitively, the key to learning more may be to stick for longer with the more coarse-grained description of our attitudes as being about degrees of principledness.

the virus of unrestrained inkhornism

Oh no my dog is ill... He´s been at the dogdoctor... I hope he gets well soon... poor benny...