I may know a thing or two, but it wouldn't be judgely to tell it.

She and Martha went over the great wardrobesful of clothes which had been Teddy Loring’s, sorting, selecting, choosing what garments she would take with her into exile.

The roadman look is very working-class (although it can be made to appear high-end), and features key pieces like matching tracksuits, technical jackets (like Nike wind runners or lightweight Stone Island shells) running caps, ‘trainers’ (like any Nike Air Max or a Reebok Classic), bum/shoulder bags, and maybe even a scarf on colder days.

How can we prove nonconsequence – that something does not follow? Or even that some set of premises are inconsistent with each other – that they are unsatisfiable, and therefore, logically, everything follows?