Last Updated:2022/12/24
For quite different reasons neither Chomsky nor Lakoff has offered good evidence for considering the Port-Royal Grammar to be an early essay in transformationalism, but the evidence they do offer raises many interesting questions about the interpretation of the Grammar (and the Logic) specifically, about the history of thought about language, and, more surprisingly, about the fundamental concepts of twentieth-century transformational grammar.
音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください
Edit Histories(0)
Source Sentence
For
quite
different
reasons
neither
Chomsky
nor
Lakoff
has
offered
good
evidence
for
considering
the
Port-Royal
Grammar
to
be
an
early
essay
in
transformationalism,
but
the
evidence
they
do
offer
raises
many
interesting
questions
about
the
interpretation
of
the
Grammar
(and
the
Logic)
specifically,
about
the
history
of
thought
about
language,
and,
more
surprisingly,
about
the
fundamental
concepts
of
twentieth-century
transformational
grammar.