Patterns of interagreement among justices also comport with an ideological explanation of Supreme Court decisionmaking.

The 'dunny' down the back yard was emptied by the council's pan man once a week. — Susan Marsden, essay Argyle, a port worker's home 19 Forbes Street Carrington New South Wales, describing 1920s way of life there https://web.archive.org/web/20060904141530/http://www.heritage.gov.au/ourhouse/essay7.html

Stupid he stares, and all-assistless stands

It may be worth the double-gearing up of court machinery in cases of truly irreplaceable losses (we cannot “undemolish” the historic building), but it is not worth the effort for a fungible good such as money.³