Evidently, in certain languages some of these meanings may be expressed by special affixes (without a causative meaning), as, for example, the meanings of commitativity (cf. 6.3), addressivity (cf. 6.5) and mutuality (cf. 6.6) in Kabardian.
In On the Beat he doubles the parts of a constable and a gang-leader. Norman was all over the place.
It was only the outstanding Cech that stood between Arsenal and a second-half rout as Spurs simply swamped their opponents after the break with a formidable display of power, pace and sheer intensity.
This type of paradox is fundamental to the Buddhist episteme and informs all aspects of Buddhist discourse. There is the tension between a buddha’s transcendence and immanence—his location within both nirvāṇa and saṃsāra, John D. Dunne writes, and Śākyamuni Buddha's involvement in the world as a teacher and his detachment from the world as an awakened being. Buddha has omnilinguality” even as Buddha in se does not speak,Paul J. Griffiths writes, and is not implicated with language. Eckel considers such paradoxes, and specifically the implications of Buddha’s absence, as points of incongruity that challenge the stability of conceptuality itself yet lead to insight, knowledge, and the ability to perceive and respond to the absence.
