Last Updated：2022/12/24
The applicant is therefore complaining not of a lack of action but rather of the decision of the local authority to reduce the care package that it had hitherto been making available to her. As such, a more appropriate comparator would be the case of Watts v. The United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53586/09 of 4 May 2010, in which the Court was content to proceed on the basis that a decision to close the care home where the elderly applicant was resident and to transfer her to another home constituted an interference with her rights under Article 8.
音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください
Edit Histories（0）
Source Sentence
The
applicant
is
therefore
complaining
not
of
a
lack
of
action
but
rather
of
the
decision
of
the
local
authority
to
reduce
the
care
package
that
it
had
hitherto
been
making
available
to
her.
As
such,
a
more
appropriate
comparator
would
be
the
case
of
Watts
v.
The
United
Kingdom
(dec.),
no.
53586/09
of
4
May
2010,
in
which
the
Court
was
content
to
proceed
on
the
basis
that
a
decision
to
close
the
care
home
where
the
elderly
applicant
was
resident
and
to
transfer
her
to
another
home
constituted
an
interference
with
her
rights
under
Article
8.
