Senator [Chuck] Grassley. […] In that case [LaChance v. White, 174 F. 3d 1378 (1999)] the Federal Circuit held that a whistleblower had to present irrefragable proof that wrongdoing actually occurred in order to prove a claim. Have you ever heard of the irrefragable proof standard, and what's your understanding of the standard? […] Mr. [Richard Gary] Taranto. The Ampro case [Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. v. U.S., 281 F. 3d 1234 (2002)] is explicit in saying that the terminology we have used, sometimes irrefragable proof, sometimes something else, really ought to be treated as the same as clear and convincing evidence.

As veterans these fullmooned beach bacchanalia, we can swear before any and all tourists that the little fish is neither mysteriaous nor mythical.

‘I have diabetic retinopathy, monsieur.’

Tom was accused of assaulting another man outside a nightclub.